Building the PFAS Toxic Tort Case: Regulation, Defendants, and Causation
PFAS litigation has matured from groundwater contamination into a broad multi-site toxic tort practice. This piece covers the EPA's 2024 ma…
Strict liability, recall reporting
PFAS litigation has matured from groundwater contamination into a broad multi-site toxic tort practice. This piece covers the EPA's 2024 ma…
When a lithium-ion battery ignites and causes serious injury, the product liability case turns on two questions that distinguish it from ot…
A statute of repose can extinguish a product claim before your client is even hurt. Here is how repose differs from limitations, why state…
The company that built the defective machine dissolved years ago, but a buyer took its assets and kept selling under the same brand. Here i…
Warning cases die on causation. The heeding presumption fills the gap by presuming a plaintiff would have followed an adequate warning, but…
The manufacturer's duty is not to prevent the crash but to avoid aggravating the injury. Building the enhanced-injury case, from Larsen to…
The component-parts doctrine sends generic suppliers home, but two exceptions keep the right defendant in. Here is how to plead and prove t…
When a fire or blowout destroys the product, the malfunction theory lets a plaintiff prove a defect by inference. How to build the record a…
Warning law usually freezes at the sale date. The post-sale duty to warn reopens the timeline, and whether it exists in your forum can deci…
Preemption decides more medical-device cases than any expert fight. A working guide to PMA versus 510(k), the narrow Riegel-Buckman gap, an…
In a prescription-drug or device case, the warning-defect theory rarely dies on whether the label was inadequate. It dies on the learned-in…
In a defect case the failed product is usually the most valuable evidence in the file. Custody discipline and a preservation protocol, set…